近期一些典型的Case

招行问题分析及建议

网站的建设创新互联公司专注网站定制,经验丰富,不做模板,主营网站定制开发.小程序定制开发,H5页面制作!给你焕然一新的设计体验!已为岗亭等企业提供专业服务。

针对近期工作中出现的问题,我选取了一些典型案例并加上自己的分析。

1.      ftpdbn1-deadlock问题:

通过打开event monitor抓取的数据,发现是由一个存储过程大量执行同一个表的delete语句导致的死锁。存储过程定义如下:

CREATEPROCEDURE CIFDBO.SP_FRM_E_FMEVRFCA_LOG_ADD_V1 (

   IN pMDL_INS_COD CIFDBO.MDL_INS_COD_ARRAY,

   ......

   IN pREC_CNT    CIFDBO.INT_ARRAY,

   OUT pRtCode    INTEGER

 )

   SPECIFIC SP_FRM_E_FMEVRFCA_LOG_ADD_V1

P1:BEGIN

 

DECLARE vEVT_ID CHAR(20);

 

DECLARE i, n INTEGER;

 

DECLARE vTimestamp TIMESTAMP;

DECLARE vDateDelete TIMESTAMP;

 

DECLARE SQLCODE INTEGER;

 

DECLAREEXIT HANDLERFOR SQLEXCEPTION

BEGIN

   SET pRtCode= SQLCODE;

END;

 

   SET pRtCode=-1;

 

   SET vTimestamp=CURRENT TIMESTAMP;

   SET vDateDelete= vTimestamp-3 MONTHS;

 

       DELETEFROM FRM.FMEVRFCA_LOGWHERE CRT_TIM< vDateDelete;

 

       SET n= CARDINALITY(pTBL_NAM);

 

   SET i=1;

 

   WHILE (i<= n) DO

 

           INSERTINTO FRM.FMEVRFCA_LOG

           (

               MDL_INS_COD  ,

               SEQ_NO       ,

               TBL_NAM      ,

               OPR_COD      ,

               UPD_TIM      ,

               REM_KEY      ,

               REC_CNT      ,

               CRT_TIM

           )

           VALUES

           (

               pMDL_INS_COD[i],

               pSEQ_NO[i]    ,

               pTBL_NAM[i]   ,

               pOPR_COD[i]   ,

               pUPD_TIM[i]   ,

               pREM_KEY[i]   ,

               pREC_CNT[i]   ,

               vTimestamp

           );

 

       SET i= i+1;

 

   END WHILE;

 

   SET pRtCode=0;

 

END P1

优化建议: 为避免将delete语句移出存储过程,由一个单独的task定期执行!

 

2.      osfdb01-ORSDB锁升级

造成锁升级的SQL语句(锁升级发生在表OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG上):

SELECT tsk.RSP_TSK_CODE, tsk.PRJ_PUB_CODE, tsk.RSP_PRJ_CODE, prj.RSP_PRJ_NAME, tsk.RSM_ID, tsk.RSM_NAME, tsk.RSM_ORG, prj.RSP_FREQ, pub.BRANCH_ID,pub.BRANCH_NAME, tsk.CHK_OBJ, tsk.ATT_NAME, tsk.CHK_DATE, tsk.PLM_RSV, tsk.REMARK, tsk.DUE_DATE, tsk.UPDATE_USER, (case when (tsk.RSP_TSK_STATUS='FINISHED'or tsk.RSP_TSK_STATUS='ODFINISHED') then tsk.UPDATE_TIMEelsenullend)as UPDATE_TIME, tsk.RSP_TSK_STATUS

FROM  OBS.RSP_TASK tsk leftjoin OBS.RSP_PRJ_PUB pubon tsk.PRJ_PUB_CODE= pub.PRJ_PUB_CODE leftjoin OBS.RSP_PRJ prjon tsk.RSP_PRJ_CODE= prj.RSP_PRJ_CODE

WHERE 1=1AND tsk.RSM_IDIN (

select sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFFwhere sta_id='157495'union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106075%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106110%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/112405%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/116955%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106085%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists (select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106095%') )

AND tsk.DUE_DATE>='2017-07-01'

AND tsk.DUE_DATE<='2017-07-31'

ORDERBYYEAR(tsk.CREATE_TIME)DESC, pub.BRANCH_IDDESC

 

抓出关于表OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG部分的SQL

select sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFFwhere sta_id='157495'union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106075%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106110%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/112405%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/116955%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106085%')union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand org.PTHlike'100001/105990/106095%')

用db2expln得到它的执行计划:

Optimizer Plan:

 

                                                                               Rows

                                                                             Operator

                                                                               (ID)

                                                                               Cost

 

                                                                             6.79546

                                                                             RETURN

                                                                              ( 1)

                                                                             6214.79

                                                                               |

                                                                             6.79546

                                                                             TBSCAN

                                                                              ( 2)

                                                                             6214.79

                                                                               |

                                                                             6.79546

                                                                              SORT

                                                                              ( 3)

                                                                             6214.79

                                                                               |

                                                                             41.2667

                                                                              UNION

                                                                              ( 4)

                                                                             6214.77

            +-----------------------+------------------------+-----------------+-----+-----------------------+---------------+-------------------+

          6.79546                6.28938                 6.79546                6.79546                6.79546           1               6.79546

          HSJOIN                 HSJOIN                  HSJOIN                 HSJOIN                 HSJOIN         IXSCAN             HSJOIN

           ( 5)                   ( 8)                    (11)                   (14)                   (17)           (20)               (21)

          1034.53                1034.53                 1034.53                1034.53                1034.53        7.58089            1034.53

         /      \              /      \               /      \              /      \              /      \         |               /      \

    102296    1.08021     102296    0.999762     102296    1.08021     102296    1.08021     102296    1.08021   101993       102296    1.08021

    TBSCAN    TBSCAN      TBSCAN     TBSCAN      TBSCAN    TBSCAN      TBSCAN    TBSCAN      TBSCAN    TBSCAN  Index:         TBSCAN    TBSCAN

     ( 6)      ( 7)        ( 9)       (10)        (12)      (13)        (15)      (16)        (18)      (19)   OWK             (22)      (23)

    293.6     735.957     293.6     735.957      293.6     735.957     293.6     735.957     293.6     735.957 P_STAFF_ID     293.6     735.957

     |          |          |          |           |          |          |          |          |          |                      |          |

   102296      16261     102296      16261      102296      16261     102296      16261     102296      16261                 102296      16261

 Table:        Table:  Table:        Table:   Table:        Table:  Table:        Table:  Table:        Table:              Table:        Table:

 OWK           OWK     OWK           OWK      OWK           OWK     OWK           OWK     OWK           OWK                 OWK           OWK

 EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG  EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG             EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG

Estimated Cost = 6214.787109

 

将SQL改编如下:

select sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFFwhere sta_id='157495'union

select sta.sta_idfrom OWK.EMP_STAFF_ORG stawhere sta.MFLAG=1andexists

(select1from OWK.EMP_ORG orgwhere sta.ORG_CODE= org.ORG_CODEand

substr(org.PTH,1,20)in ('100001/105990/106075','100001/105990/106110','100001/105990/112405','100001/105990/116955','100001/105990/106085','100001/105990/106095'))

用db2expln得到新SQL的执行计划:

Optimizer Plan:

 

                    Rows

                  Operator

                    (ID)

                    Cost

 

                  40.2545

                  RETURN

                   ( 1)

                  1041.11

                    |

                  40.2545

                  TBSCAN

                   ( 2)

                  1041.11

                    |

                  40.2545

                   SORT

                   ( 3)

                  1041.11

                    |

                  41.2545

                   UNION

                   ( 4)

                  1041.09

                 /      \

          40.2545           1

          HSJOIN         IXSCAN

           ( 5)           ( 8)

          1033.51        7.58089

         /      \         |

    102296    6.39886   101993

    TBSCAN    TBSCAN  Index:

     ( 6)      ( 7)   OWK

    293.6     734.935 P_STAFF_ID

     |          |

   102296      16261

 Table:        Table:

 OWK           OWK

 EMP_STAFF_ORG EMP_ORG

 Estimated Cardinality = 40.254482

        简单改写后,返回的结果集不变,但效率提高了很多。可见SQL语句

3.      didisrvdb02-逻辑读高问题:

逻辑读高的SQL:

update (select TRN_STATUS,REAL_SERIAL

from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1

where TRN_STATUS=:L0and CUST_ACCNO=:L1and REAL_SERIAL=:L2and ID>=:L3and ID<=:L4

orderby idascfetch first5000 rowsonly)

set TRN_STATUS=:L5 ,REAL_SERIAL=:L6

 

查看表 DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1上的索引:

索引名                                   索引包含的列

SQL160106192202630                     +MERCH_DATE+MERCH_SERIAL

OUSYS1_INDEX_1                         +ID+TRN_BATCH

OUSYS1_INDEX_2                         +TRN_STATUS+CUST_ACCNO+REAL_SERIAL+SEND_FLAG

OUSYS1_INDEX_3                         +TRN_STATUS+MERCH_DATE+ID

OUSYS1_INDEX_4                         +ID

 

表的行数及索引的键值情况如下:

db2 "select count(1) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

2685595

db2 "select count(distinct SEND_FLAG) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

1

db2 "select count(distinct TRN_STATUS) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

4

db2 "select count(distinct CUST_ACCNO) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

1

db2 "select count(distinct REAL_SERIAL) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

1247

db2 "select count(distinct ID) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

2685074

db2 "select count(distinct MERCH_DATE) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

6

db2 "select count(distinct MERCH_SERIAL) from DPAY.TAB_OUSYS_INFO1"

2685339

        从以上的数据可以看出,此表上的索引建立的很不合理。根据索引建立原则,我们应该选择强键值列作为索引列,而且越强的越要越放在前面,所以此表上的索引应该做如下优化:

l 对索引SQL160106192202630进行改造,使索引包含的列为+MERCH_SERIAL或+MERCH_SERIAL+MERCH_DATE,这样根据MERCH_SERIAL检索时也可以用到此索引。

l 索引OUSYS1_INDEX_1可以保留,但意义不大,因为ID已经是强键值列。

l 对索引OUSYS1_INDEX_2进行改造,只保留REAL_SERIAL列,至少也应该将REAL_SERIAL列放在最前面。

l 索引OUSYS1_INDEX_3可以删除,至少也应该将ID列放在最前面。

l 保留OUSYS1_INDEX_4索引。

 

数据库活动时间为2016-01-06-20.19.41:

db2 "SELECT SUBSTR(DB_NAME, 1, 20) AS DB_NAME, DB_STATUS, SERVER_PLATFORM, DB_LOCATION, DB_CONN_TIME FROM SYSIBMADM.SNAPDB"

 

DB_NAME   DB_STATUS       SERVER_PLATFORM DB_LOCATION DB_CONN_TIME

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- --------------- ------------ --------------------------

DIDIPRI     ACTIVE          AIX64           LOCAL       2016-01-06-20.19.41.644178

        检查数据库的索引使用情况:

db2 "SELECT VARCHAR(S.INDSCHEMA, 20) AS INDSCHEMA,VARCHAR(S.INDNAME, 20) AS INDNAME,T.DATA_PARTITION_ID, T.MEMBER,T.INDEX_SCANS,T.INDEX_ONLY_SCANS FROM TABLE(MON_GET_INDEX(null,null, -2)) as T, SYSCAT.INDEXES AS S WHERE T.TABSCHEMA = S.TABSCHEMA AND T.TABNAME = S.TABNAME AND T.IID = S.IID and S.INDSCHEMA not like 'SYS%' ORDER BY INDEX_SCANS DESC"|more

数据库中非系统索引共336个:

db2 "SELECT count(*) FROM TABLE(MON_GET_INDEX(null,null, -2)) as T, SYSCAT.INDEXES AS S WHERE T.TABSCHEMA = S.TABSCHEMA AND T.TABNAME = S.TABNAME AND T.IID = S.IID and S.INDSCHEMA not like 'SYS%'"

336

有99个索引自数据库激活以来从未使用:

db2 "SELECT count(*) FROM TABLE(MON_GET_INDEX(null,null, -2)) as T, SYSCAT.INDEXES AS S WHERE T.TABSCHEMA = S.TABSCHEMA AND T.TABNAME = S.TABNAME AND T.IID = S.IID and S.INDSCHEMA not like 'SYS%' and T.INDEX_SCANS=0"

99

4.      问题分析及建议:

根据以上的问题分析,应用方面存在如下几个问题:

l 只考虑功能的实现,对是否会造成锁竞争,SQL语句执行效率是否底下考虑不足。

l 数据库存在大量的无效索引和不合理的索引。

几点建议如下:

l 在数据库报告中增加“从未使用的索引”项,并考虑删除以节省空间和提高效率。

l 对开发人员进行锁机制,SQL优化,建立高效索引方面的培训,以从源头解决问题,减少运维压力。

分享题目:近期一些典型的Case
分享地址:https://www.cdcxhl.com/article24/ipepje.html

成都网站建设公司_创新互联,为您提供域名注册定制网站建站公司移动网站建设微信小程序企业建站

广告

声明:本网站发布的内容(图片、视频和文字)以用户投稿、用户转载内容为主,如果涉及侵权请尽快告知,我们将会在第一时间删除。文章观点不代表本网站立场,如需处理请联系客服。电话:028-86922220;邮箱:631063699@qq.com。内容未经允许不得转载,或转载时需注明来源: 创新互联

营销型网站建设